反馈：Attendance and participation recorded. Thank you for submitting your slides.

反馈：Both chapters are covered accurately and the Chapter 7 Technical question is included and correctly solved. The output gap percentage framing is the right way to show the calculation. The answers in Q1 are well-organized across all four groups.

⚠️ 扣 3 分：页数不达标（page count）

详细反馈：The submission demonstrates a solid and well-structured analysis but could further strengthen its rigor by more deeply evaluating the trade-offs and implementation challenges of the alternatives, particularly in terms of feasibility and organizational constraints. The proposed solution is logical and well-justified, though it remains somewhat high-level without detailed discussion of how the structural reforms would be operationalized and sustained over time. Additionally, while ethical issues are clearly identified, the analysis could benefit from more explicit integration of formal ethical frameworks to enhance depth.

🎉 Outstanding（最高评级）：

反馈：Qi, I appreciate the information that you offered this week about your work in Business Development and Sales at Zhengda Prosperity LLC. Quality content was shared about connecting daily work to macroeconomic concepts. I like what you mentioned about your role contributing to net exports in the GDP formula. AWESOME application of theory. It was interesting to learn more about how you use economic cycles to guide supplier contract decisions. Quality work this week! I hope that you continue to enjoy MBA306. I am looking forward to your submission of Paper #2, which is due on May 10, 2026.

反馈：All four questions are covered correctly. The answers are concise and accurate. The Q3 section handles the indexation trade-off well, including the point that full indexation may not be worth it at low inflation but becomes more useful under extreme inflation. The Tobin Q4 answer captures the nominal wage rigidity argument correctly.

⚠️ 又扣页数分："Failed to follow page count requirement"（这次仍是页数不足）

详细反馈：The submission is well-developed and covers all key areas, but much of the discussion remains descriptive rather than analytically deep, with limited critical evaluation of trade-offs across sections. The proposed law is clear but could be strengthened with more detailed implementation specifics, enforcement mechanisms, and measurable outcomes. Additionally, some arguments could be more concise and focused to enhance overall clarity and impact.

🎉 满分！第一次 closed-book 考试 100/100 通过

反馈：All 12 questions correct. Q7 switches the standard d/c order — the transitory liquidity-constrained consumer (d) ranks highest because any income shock goes immediately to consumption. Q5 and Q10 are the shortest answers and could use more development.

🎉 突破 Khan 高分上限：The infographic clearly presents all required components, but the level of privacy is still described in broad terms (e.g., "highest reasonable level") without precise or measurable standards. Some sections are slightly dense, which reduces quick readability for an infographic format. Overall, the content is strong but could be more concise for sharper impact.